Monday, July 26, 2010

Really?

... No, Really?!?!

The New York Times explodes a shocker on the front page of its Sunday paper this week.

Court Under Roberts Is Most Conservative in Decades


Whew! I'm glad they finally figured this out!

Maybe now they'll get around to calling "enhanced interrogations" what they really are?

Now that would be "breaking" news.



Sunday, July 18, 2010

All of this happened before....(Redux)

... Does It Have To Happen Again?

A few months ago, I highlighted Bill Moyers' look at The Secret Government and wondered if we can avoid the future our history would seem to project.

Well, as is my wont, I recently ran across a wonderful quote. Try to guess when it was said.
"Wall Street owns the country. It is no longer a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, but a government of Wall Street, by Wall Street and for Wall Street ... Our laws are the output of a system which clothes rascals in robes and honesty in rags ... the politicians said we suffered from overproduction. Overproduction when 10,000 little children ... starve to death every year in the U.S. and over 100,000 shop girls in New York are forced to sell their virtue for bread...
There are thirty men in the United States whose aggregate wealth is over one and one-half billion dollars. There are half a million looking for work ... We want money, land and transportation. We want abolition of the National Banks, and we want the power to make loans direct from the government. We want the accursed foreclosure system wiped out ... We will not pay our debts to the loan-shark companies until the Government pays its debts to us.
The people are at bay, let the bloodhounds of money who have dogged us thus far beware."

Did you guess 1890? A Kansan Populist named Mary Ellen Lease spoke these words at a time, admittedly worse than our own times, when the anger at wealth and backlash against elite privilege was rapidly rising.

And although the Populist Party was unable to "crack" the lock on elections held by the GOP and Democrats, much of the their strength, organization and platform was coopted and adopted int he following decades.

Hopefully we will not have to wait decades.



(Quote found in Zinn's A People's History of the United States, a book that every citizen should read and digest.)

Sunday, July 11, 2010

A New "Progressive Era"

...Not By a Long Shot

Eric Alterman delivers a gut-wrenching, blistering critique of our Nation, how we govern ourselves and the pernicious influence wealth, campaign money, propaganda and reaction are having on our (what I would consider ignorant) Citizens. "Kabuki Democracy" is a rare treat on the internets (thanks Digby for highlighting it), one that must be read and thought about.

Alterman holds out hope that
the Obama administration's willingness to compromise so extensively on the promises that candidate Obama made during the 2008 campaign would be that as president, he is playing for time. Obama is taking the best deal on the table today, but hopes and expects that once he is re-elected in 2012—a pretty strong bet, I'd say—he will build on the foundations laid during his first term to bring on the fundamental "change" that is not possible in today's environment. This would be consistent with FDR's strategy during his second term and makes a kind of sense when one considers the nature of the opposition he faces today and the likelihood that it will discredit itself following a takeover of one or both houses in 2010.
Well, "hope" has been a staple of Brand Obama for a while, no? And perhaps Alterman, like many other left-leaning people, has not yet been burned hard enough by the failure to deliver on the progressive promises made during the 2008 campaign. This patriot held out too, hoping for much of the past year that the Obama Administration would make good on righting our ship of state and make the changes necessary to salve the pain of the past 30-40 years. To be fair, some good has emerged - e.g., the 2009 ERRA stimulus program, a New START Treaty to further reduce nuclear weapons, and a couple of non-wingnut Supreme Court justice nominations(but far from liberal, much less progressive). Other "achievements," such as health care reform and financial regulation reform, are at best poor compromises developed by the real powers in DC (permanent incumbent politicians and their corporate lobbyist friends) to appear as relief for major problems while protecting those who are always protected. And there is much undone - or worse, continued to be done) such as a foreign policy subservient to a putative "ally," domestic wiretapping without judicial review, torture and illegal imprisonments and even assassinations of U.S. citizens at the order of the President.

But our times call for decisive, radical actions, not the compromised measures or "half loaves" we've been delivered thus far. And although Alterman tries to be optimistic, I think he correctly identifies the real problems inherent in our government today:

the system is rigged, and it's rigged against us.
This is one reason I previously highlighted Drifty's post and George Carlin's famous "American Dream" monologue. To his credit, Alterman also points to one of the methods by which we "fix" the system - namely:
progressives who take movement organizing seriously need to develop their institutions independently
and
[they] need to keep up the pressure they have begun to place on the mainstream media not to adopt the deliberately misleading and frequently false frames foisted on readers and viewers by an increasingly self-confident and well-funded right-wing noise machine (thank the FSM - or Al Gore - for the internets!)
and
we need better, smarter organizing at every level and a willingness on the part of liberals and leftists to work with what remains of the center to begin the process of reforms that are a beginning, rather than an endpoint in the process of societal transformation
These practical measures are a start. But they are not enough. Progressives also need to wrest control of their local parties and governments from the hands of traditional party functionaries, many of whom have only "done government" their whole lives. In short, they need to lift a page from the Fundamentalist "Goldwaterites" inside the GOP who, once empowered, decided to trash the place (but remain, despite their national minority, firmly in charge of the political agenda).

And once wrested from the hands of the "government is the problem" believers (who are the politicians inside the government themselves!), they must fight to deliver government that delivers, government worthy of respect, government that is a vocation and profession, government that is the solution to the problem instead of being perceived as the problem, and government that is not corrupt but serves all.

Unless and until these things occur, those who believe in progressive, thoughtful, enriching and empowering government will remain on the outside looking in, bitching and moaning, and wondering what the hell kind of country they are living in. Can these things actually occur? Yes, they can. But only where they are fought for by those willing to fight for them.

And fight for them they must because we are in a race in this country. A race to turn from the cliff before we all go down together.

Monday, July 5, 2010

"You Have To Be Asleep...

... to Believe It"

Noah over at Down With Tyranny highlighted one of George Carlin's greatest pieces, titled "The American Dream." In a mere three and a half minute monologue, George tells more truth than you'll ever hear in a conventional conversation about our country. The biggest truth of all is simply this, "they [owners, politicians, celebrities, bosses, etc] don't care about you."

Carlin was a great comic; smart, witty, and absolutely able to get to the heart of our foibles, our hypocrisy and our shames. I miss his voice and his critiques. Satirists and commentators like George, Mark Twain, and Sinclair Lewis are rare and precious balms to the souls bruised by the reality of our national life.

Take a break on your holiday Monday and reflect, is this the country I know? If it is, is this the country I want? And if not, what am I going to do about it?


Friday, July 2, 2010

An Epic Takedown...

... or one of the best blog posts I've read recently

Driftglass is on my blogroll for a reason. He never fails to connect and his style is without peer in my opinion. I for one am extremely glad to see that he keeps after it, post after post, year after year.

If there was justice in this world, he'd be the op-ed writer for the NYT and not Bobo, a frequent (and all too easy) target. Or, he'd at least be their illustrator! As one of his regulars pointed out int he comments to this highlighted post, Drifty should be hired by Rolling Stone ASAP!

As for the post itself, as they say, Go.Read.It.All. I know that critiquing the published punditry is like fishing with dynamite, but these people are playing a vital role in continuing our nation's slide into oblivion. They are the fiddles being played as Versailles-on-Potomac burns through our resources, credit and good name. They are the enablers of all that is happening. And they, like all the other (bipartisan) glitterati who've "sold out," are getting rich while the rest of or Citizens are headed to penury.

Here is but a snippet of Driftglass' latest anti-Bobo work; its wonderfully done and truly inspired:

Son, we live in a world that has plutoctats. And those plutoctats have to be guarded by men with newspaper columns.

Who's gonna do it? You, driftglass? You, Taibbi?

I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Journalism and you curse professional cum dumpsters like me. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Journalism's death, while tragic, probably makes the Ruling Class incrementally more powerful. And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, makes the Ruling Class incrementally more powerful.

You don't want the to go to that cocktail party, because deep down, in places you don't talk about on your Journalism Listservs you want me at that cocktail party.


You me need me there.

We use words like craven, stenographer, Villager...we use these words as the backbone to a life spent defending entrenched interests.

You use 'em as a punchline.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to employees who rise and sleep under the blanket of the very ad revenue I provide, then questions the manner in which I provide it. I'd prefer you just said "Thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a cocktail weenie and go grope a Senator. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you're entitled to.

Thanks Drifty for one of your finest works.



d r i f t g l a s s: David Brooks: The Man of Constant Sorrow

Thursday, June 24, 2010

(Still) Alive

... and Kicking

I know it's been a while (two months!) since I last put a post up here on Blogger. Where has the time gone? Lots has happened -- and a lot of it has just downright ticked me off.

In any case, some of you might have seen me commenting around the blogosphere - especially on those blogs listed on the left side of the page. Lately it seems that this is about the best I can do given the constraints of time, family, energy and outrage. Needless to say, given the arrival of spring and my headlong rush into a new phase of life, I've not found the time to put down onto this blog the ruminations that crossed the threshold of my mind.

In the meantime, let me simply comment on General Stan's Spectacular Flame-out. I'm glad General Stan had his head (and job) handed to him. For Obama to do anything less than firing would simply taken away "the babymakers" (thanks FDChief!) and completely given the military dominance over even the office of the President. Frankly, they already dominate nearly all aspects of what are nation does, just as President Eisenhower warned us of. And I remain quite pessimisstic that until a complete and total economic collapse visits our lands, the military and its industrial-congressional-think tank enablers will continue to dominate the development of our national strategy - foreign and domestic. The ability of our current system to think critically, recognize its bias and develop a full range of honest options - much less reform itself - simply does not exist right now. Perhaps in the future it will but I doubt it.

And its not just the military suffering through terminal cranial-rectal inversion. Across the spectrum of our government we see example after example after example of the same malady. Sadly, and in spite of the clear interest in our citizens left and right to put fixes in place, our leaders simply cannot get it together. Each side of the spectrum only wants to win for its side -- and even if they were to win they would probably still try to perpetuate the fight if only to keep themselves employed!

So, for this Patriot, I try to keep my sense of humor and watch a whole lot of John Stewart's show. And I work on moving on to what's next. Perhaps more about that topic in a later post.

Until then friends, don't let the bastards get you down!

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Love Him or Hate Him...

... but Mike Moore stands for the Citizen

From the first time I saw Roger & Me, I've been a Micheal Moore fan. Yes, he's bombastic. He's over the top. He's been known to distort. And without question, he's a polarizing rabble rouser.

In his heart though, Mike Moore loves the average American. And he's struggled mightily for decades now to show the rest of us what we often do not want to see. What exactly it means to our fellow citizens when their jobs are shipped off to foreign shores. How the myth meets reality when it comes to recruiting for our volunteer military. Why the middle class is disappearing and what it portends for us all.

Moore was interviewed by WAMU's Diane Rehm earlier this week. The entire interview is worth a listen. Do yourself a favor, just click the link and the "LISTEN" button in the upper left. And enjoy one of the few progressive voices allowed out there on the free airwaves we've given our nation's broadcasters.

Michael Moore | The Diane Rehm Show

Saturday, March 13, 2010

Alan Grayson on Wars: We Won, Now Let's Go Home

What else needs to be said? Grayson continues to amaze with his very simple, very direct and very thoughtful discussion of our future direction.

Watch it. Spend four minutes to see how Congress is supposed to act.



And remember, in those four minutes, the other members were probably earning (extorting?) thousands of dollars from corporate lobbyists and PACs.


Monday, February 15, 2010

All of this happened before....

... Will it happen again?

More than twenty years ago, Bill Moyers broadcast this truly amazing, thoughtful and angry critique of the Iran-Contra Affair, and the policy of official government secrecy that was instrumental in allowing that treason to occur.

It is as salient today as it was in 1987.

A theme that ran through the re-imagined TV series Battlestar Galactica was the phrase, "All of this has happened before. And all of will happen again." Indeed, when you see the same activities of the government, the same beliefs in untrammeled executive power, the inability of Congress to participate in controlling the course of our national destiny, you have to wonder if we are seeing is all happen again.

Today, our Congress has even less courage to try to find out what happened, despite knowing what we already know of the secret, unconstitutional and illegal covert activities undertaken by the Bush-Cheney Administration.

Take some time to watch this whole (90 minutes!!!) presentation. And consider. If we are ever able to right our ship of state, how will we prevent traitors to our Constitution like Ollie North from making it happen again?

The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis, by Bill Moyers




Wednesday, February 10, 2010

The Folks at Comedy Central Get It...

... and because they do, they need to be shared!

First, John Stewart unveils AmeriGasm!
The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
AmeriGasm
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis


And then Stephen Colbert gets into the action:
The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Sarah Palin Uses a Hand-O-Prompter
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical HumorEconomy


It just doesn't get any better than this.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Weimer Rising?

There are times when James Howard Kunstler strikes me as one of those overwrought "cranks" Charles Pierce says in his book Idiot America that we need in our country (it's a fine read I might add!). In The Long Emergency, Kunstler put forth a rather pessimistic view of our national trajectory in the face of the end of cheap energy. Indeed, Kunstler's views of our future can be downright frightening - the end will be violently painful, almost apocalyptic a la "The Road." (For a less pessimistic view of the future, check out John Michael Greer's The Long Descent.)

Kunstler also writes a blog sharing his view of current events, and how they seem to dovetail into his predictions of our future. To wit:
"The Tea Party people are the corn-pone Nazis I have been warning you about. They are gathering strength in numbers as President Obama and congress fritter away their remaining legitimacy in a manner of governance that more and more resembles an endless Chinese Fire Drill. The delusional craziness of the Tea Partyists exists in direct proportion to the wimpy deceit of the government, especially in matters of money and statistics reporting. Our political leaders are resorting to wholesale deceit because the truth of our situation -- comprehensive bankruptcy -- is too painful to dwell on and for the most part they are too chicken too state it." (We're Weimar, Feb 8, 2010)
So, is Kunstler right? Are we entering our own new Weimer period with the "Tea Party" denizens in the lead? Are these angry citizens delusional?

I have to admit, the so-called "Tea Party" folks have me flummoxed. These citizens are definitely angry about many of the same things I am angry about: lack of governance, arrogant elites, financial fraudsters, do-nothing legislators. But, it seems to me that often the root of their anger lies in more base human emotions: racism, tribalism, jealousy and busy-bodiness. And I cannot get over the fact that many of these genuinely angry Americans are being manipulated by the very forces they are angry with. I mean really, do they honestly believe multi-millionaire media stars like Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh actually care about them - except as mindless listeners good for high ratings (and higher salaries)? Does Rupert Murdoch and his corporate media automatons in Fox News and the Wall Street Journal actually desire the involvement of these angry citizens in their own governance? And, if this really is a new grassroots band of Minutemen arising to oppose the tyranny of Washington, why does Sarah Palin get paid thousands of dollars to speak to them (if she's so committed, shouldn't she speak gratis? And the "convention" be not-for-profit?)??

Well, I think Kunstler is right on about the root cause of the anger -- the visible end of these citizen's comfortable way of life. You know, when the end of a good thing becomes undeniable, there will be those who react by denying. Or lashing out. Or blaming. And I think we see all of these on grand display when it comes to the genuine anger of vocal Tea Party supporters. But my crystal ball remains hazier than Kunstler's in that I'm not as sure as he that these manipulated folks are going to be the change agent that drags us all down the Wiemar rabbit hole. Time will tell, of course, but one thing is for certain -- thoughtful citizens need to get out there also and better inform our fellow citizens as to the root causes of their anger. Because if they remain solely educated by the likes of Beck and Limbaugh, then they will form the large body of "useful idiots" needed to intimidate the rest of us.

Over at Stonekettle Station, Jim raises an alarm as well. He's right about how these things start. But, have we entered the phase of inevitable ending?

And if you care to, you can listen to Diane Rehm's conversation on the Tea Party and what it means to America here.

(Image found via Photobucket.)

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Lamenting the "Late, Great Press"

Chris Hedges recently published a wonderful column over at TruthDig that is well worth your time if you "hate today's Media." In this, Hedges absolutely nails the dysfunction in our Versailles on the Potomac:
"When reporting depends heavily on access it becomes very difficult to challenge those who grant or deny that access. This craven desire for access has turned huge sections of the Washington press, along with most business reporters, into courtiers. The need to be included in press briefings and background interviews with government or business officials, as well as the desire for leaks and early access to official documents, obliterates journalistic autonomy."
And with this, Hedges rightly identifies why (and how) it is so easy to mislead the Citizens in today's USA:

"Or is the public, as Walter Lippmann wrote, now so deeply uninformed and divorced from the inner workings of power and diplomacy as to make it a clean slate on which our armies of skilled propagandists can, often through the press, leave a message? "
As they say, read it all.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

A Saner Foreign Policy

... Just Leave People Alone

This morning, Howie (Down With Tyranny) blogs about the "green on blue" deaths of two US soldiers earlier this week in Wardak Province, Afghanistan. Sadly, this event has passed with hardly any notice in the broader stream of traditional media blasted at the American people. Howie places this event in a better context, noting the great likelihood that disrespect of and failure to understand your allies (and enemies) culture are the root cause for these deaths.

Howie also highlights comments made by Rep. Alan Grayson several months ago. As with understanding national financial scandal, anti-citizen politics, and blatant unconstitutional governance taken up by Congress, Grayson has been a stalwart proponent of bringing our forces back home and simplifying our foreign policy.

I think that the aid program is a fig leaf trying to make Congress and the American people feel better about the war and about killing. I think that diplomacy in the areas of fig leaf to try to make the American people think that there is some constructive alternative to the war when the war itself is destructive and not constructive.

I think that the basic premise that we can alter Afghan society is greatly flawed. Afghanistan is simply the part of Asia that was never occupied by the Russians or the English in the Great Game. It’s not a country; it’s not even a place. It’s just an empty place on the map. It’s terra incognita. People who live there are a welter of different tribes, different language groups, different religious beliefs.

All over the country you find different people who have nothing to do with each other except for the fact that we call them Afghans, who don’t even call themselves Afghans. They’re Tajiks, or they’re Pashtuns, or they’re Hazzaras or someone else. The things that hold them together are simply the things that we try to create artificially.

The idea that we could transform that society or any other society through aid, I think, is entirely questionable. I’ve never seen it happen; probably never will happen. If you go to the Stan countries north of Afghanistan, and I’ve been to all of them, what you find is that the way that the Russians altered that society was by crushing it. Stalin killed half a million Muslims in Kazakhstan, in Turkmenistan, in Kyrgyzstan, in Uzbekistan.

He simply sliced off the head of that society in order to remake it in the image that he wanted. And I think that we would have to do no less if we wanted to remake Afghanistan in our image. We’d have to destroy it in order to save it, and I don’t think the American people are ever going to do that to anybody. So I think that the underlying premise is simply wrong.

I’ve been to 175 countries all around the world, including Afghanistan and every country in that region, and what I’ve seen everywhere I went is that there are some commonalities. Everywhere you go, people want to fall in love. Everywhere you go, people love children. Everywhere, they love children. Everywhere you go, there’s a taboo against violence. Every single place you go. And everywhere you go, people want to be left alone. And that’s the best foreign policy of all. Just to leave people alone. (Alan Grayson, 10/9/2009)

Think about that for a moment. Just Leave People Alone. A thoroughly American sentiment, one that can be traced all the way back to the wisdom of Washington:
My policy has been, and will continue to be, while I have the honor to remain in the administration of the government, to be upon friendly terms with, but independent of, all the nations of the earth. To share in the broils of none. To fulfil our own engagements. To supply the wants, and be carriers for them all: Being thoroughly convinced that it is our policy and interest to do so.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

A Musical Interlude...

... Something a Little Different

Old Crow Medicine Show
I Hear Them Now




The song's a couple years old now, but I think touches on the angst deep into our national psyche. Hope and warning all rolled into one.

Do you think our leaders "hear them all"?

Thursday, January 21, 2010

If Corporations Are "Persons"...

... Why Don't They Pay Federal Income Taxes Like Citizens?

Not so long ago, I highlighted what I consider a fundamental misreading of our Constitution, namely the century-long assertion by the Supreme Court that business corporations are entitled to constitutional protections as living citizens are. In that post, I mentioned that the SCOTUS was expected to rule on corporate free speech in relation to federal election campaigns. (Curiously, this was one of the more trafficked posts in what is a very scarcely read blog.)

Well today, the SCOTUS ruled -- and not unexpectedly -- in a 5-4 decision that reinforces the principle that "corporations" are "persons" in the eyes of our Constitution and laws. (Of course, "enemy combatants," real living humans who probably engaged in real crimes against our Citizens, remain "non-persons" not entitled to any protections given in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. But, I digress.) Naturally, opinions are as divided as our "apolitical" SCOTUS, with many of our more expressive authoritarian leaning citizens expressing glee that no one can be silenced, not even corporations! On the other side, citizen advocacy groups bemoan this decision as the end of any real representation in elections as now even greater amounts of BIG MONEY will flow into the electoral process, lining the pockets of the infotainment ad delivery companies, airing even more campaign ads (at least they will displace the erectile dysfuntion pitches) and further distracting-bamboozling-and stupefying the voters who bother to do their civic duty.

Do powerful interests already greatly influence our elections? Yep. Do they really need more ability to influence elections? Apparently so. (Don't believe me? Take a few minutes watching David Corn and Kevin Drum on a recent episode of Bill Moyers Journal.)

Does today's decision make our elected representatives more responsive to their constituents? Nope. But does anyone really care anymore? Based on the ill-informed punditry screaming the same BS talking points all over the media tonight ("Now Unions can spend unlimited!" "Small Business can get into the elections YAY!" "Middle class candidates have a shot against multi-millionaire, self-financing incumbents!"), it seems that the level of delusion is high and that by next week, many will be convinced that this is the best thing to happen to elections since Bush v. Gore equally protected all ballots (except for the ones not counted).

How many will be so informed as to know that the plaintiff in this case is a criminal, wingnut election fraudster backed by the very corporations so happy to be able to throw their money around unfettered? My guess, only that "angry left" -- you know, the same cabal of people who are so all powerful that Scott Brown pretty much walked away in the Massachusetts special election!

Well friends. We do live in a Republic. That is, if we can keep it.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Guant�namo “Suicides”

A Cover-up Continues?

Scott Horton has published an advance text of the upcoming cover story in Harpers regarding the 2006 deaths of three Guantanamo detainees while in U.S. custody. Horton is a dogged investigator, renown lawyer and compelling blogger. He has been strongly critical of U.S. torture and rendition policies throughout the Bush Administration and, like Glenn Greenwald, strongly advocated for the Obama Administration to dump it's "look forward, not backward" policies.

"When President Barack Obama took office last year, he promised to “restore the standards of due process and the core constitutional values that have made this country great.” Toward that end, the president issued an executive order declaring that the extra-constitutional prison camp at Guant�namo Naval Base “shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order.” Obama has failed to fulfill his promise. Some prisoners there are being charged with crimes, others released, but the date for closing the camp seems to recede steadily into the future. Furthermore, new evidence now emerging may entangle Obama’s young administration with crimes that occurred during the George W. Bush presidency, evidence that suggests the current administration failed to investigate seriously—and may even have continued—a cover-up of the possible homicides of three prisoners at Guant�namo in 2006." The Guant�namo “Suicides”: A Camp Delta sergeant blows the whistle—By Scott Horton (Harper's Magazine)
This article demands to be read. And read again by all officers of our government who are connected to national security and intelligence. Most importantly, it demands an answer from our Attorney General, not only to the specifics of this case, but to the broader issue of what exactly is the Department of Justice doing to investigate torture- and "enemy combatant"-related crimes, but also how FREE the Department actually is to go after those who committed heinous crimes in all our names.

As the first year of Obama'a administration ends, we learn new and, quite frankly, disturbing details about the "suicide" of detainees in Guantanamo. And, as this year ends, we now officially see the failure of one of Obama's signature promises made in the heady, post-inaugural days. That is, to close GTMO within one year. Probably the saddest and most damning aspects of this entire case is that the facts have long been well known. And whitewashed.


Update: Scott Horton published a follow-up to the original story today focusing on the compromised statement made by a key officer in charge of the Cuban prison camp as well as the tepid "non-response" by the Justice Department. If you're smelling a rat, you should be. The response so far seems all very reminiscent of the "official" stories being put out ahead of the first breaking of Abu Ghraib story.

Will there be accountability? When?


"In the Nurse's Office...

... Because Once Again They Glued Their Balls to Their Thighs!"

No one, but no one, tells the sad state of political affairs better than John Stewart.

Yes, I know. This is the second Stewart riff in as many posts. But what can this serving patriot say but , "yup."

Well, maybe all I can say anymore is "sigh."

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Mass Backwards
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis


By tomorrow, it will be all over but the crying. Or the celebrating?

But I have to ask. If it is close, with the Massachusetts pols play the same game that kept Al Franken out of office for months?

Thursday, January 14, 2010

"We Just Paid a Lot of Money...

... for Someone to F*&k Us!"

Only John Stewart and his crew at the Daily Show can really explain why "we had too."

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Clusterf#@k to the Poor House - Wall Street Bonuses
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealth Care Crisis

Saturday, January 9, 2010

A Corporate Solution?

... or a Solution to Corporations?

Not so long ago, I read John Michael Greer's book, The Long Descent, and found it to be an excellent, thought-provoking exposition on our shared future in the declining resource world. Greer's fundamental thesis is that despite the cresting of the cheap energy era, our chances of complete, Hobbesian collapse and chaos are much less likely than a slow, steady roll into a de-industrialized future. If you've read James Kunstler's The Long Emergency, and then feared for your future, then The Long Descent may be for you.

After reading his book, I traveled over to Greer's blog - The Archdruid Report (yep, he's a druid). And right off the bat, I found another interesting location in the intertubes to read and ponder. In a post this week, Greer lays out some thoughts on the difficulties powerful special interests and corporations are wreaking on our polity and our attempts to respond the the dynamic world around us. Its an interesting post, but what really caught my eye was Greer's thoughts about how to deal with the "personhood" corporations have long enjoyed in the United States. (Yep, in many ways, corporations in this country have all the rights of a living citizen.... you can think a 19th Century Supreme Court ruling for that!). Greer suggests that if corporations are indeed "persons," then perhaps they should also suffer for the felony crimes they commit:

"My more perceptive readers may be wondering at this point whether I’m seriously proposing that corporations should be thrown in jail or put to death. Yes, that’s what I’m proposing, with the adjustments needed to account for the differences between corporate persons and natural persons. What’s the essential nature of imprisonment for a crime, after all? The criminal ceases to be a free person; for a specified period of time, he is a chattel of society, and society has the right to profit from his labor during that period. And capital punishment? The criminal, having proven that he isn’t willing to abide by even the most minimal standards of social existence, ceases to exist by act of society. Both of these can be applied to corporations easily enough."

An interesting thought, no? Personally, I'd rather see the corporations stripped of their "rights" as persons in the eyes of the law. But, this would seem an appropriate remedy and fair treatment of all "persons" (living and corporate) under the laws.

Greer is far more optimistic than I amthat such taming of our out-of-control corporation could actually occur. Nevertheless, I do agree with him that "the power of corporate interests might more usefully be seen as a response to the general weakness of all other parties." If and when these "other parties" (labor, main street business, disaffected minorities, etc) learn (and re-learn) how to focus their political power, then we might just see an end to corporate personhood, or failing that, adoption of corporate sentancing outlined above. After all, are we Melians, bound to suffer "what we must?"

No. I think not.

Updated 1-10-09: Here is a short video from McClatchey and the Real News Network discussing the upcoming SCOTUS ruling on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The decision, which is due soon, portends to lighten existing regulation of corporate "persons" and put even more of their money into our political election process. Take a look:


More at The Real News

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Mercenaries....

... an affront to us all.

Jeremy Scahill delivers yet another report of American-paid mercenary crime...

Two former Blackwater operatives were arrested by US federal agents on murder charges, stemming from their alleged involvement in the shooting deaths of two Afghan civilians in Kabul in May. They have been identified as Justin Cannon, 27, of Corpus Christi, Texas, and Christopher Drotleff, 29, of Virginia Beach, Va. They have been charged with “crimes including second-degree murder, attempted murder and firearms offenses while working as contractors for the U.S. Department of Defense in Afghanistan,” according to the Justice Department. The 13-count indictment was returned by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia on Jan. 6 and unsealed today.
RebelReports - Two Blackwater Guards Arrested by FBI on Murder Charges
Mercenaries were suppressed after Europe's devastating Thirty Years War... for good reason. Mercenaries are not bound to states or their citizens; they are only bound to their next paycheck, and when that paycheck stops or the wars end, then what? Britain's use of mercenaries in North America during the 1770s was a significant part of why the colonists formed their own army and fought to free themselves. And the return of these unlawful combatants to our modern scene is yet another indication that the world of states that monopolize the use of lethal force within their established borders is in decline (perhaps terminal decline).

But who will control them? I once thought the plot lines underlying such popular series as "24" (Starkwood) and "Jericho" (Jennings & Rall) was far-out Hollywood writing that was impossible in my country today. But with the tentacles of private corporations spread across the entire national security establishment, one has to wonder exactly who these companies, and their mercenaries, are loyal too?

Once again, wisdom can be found in the actions of our republic's founders. Or, in the case of the wingnuts, from one of their historic stars, Machiavelli:
...if one holds his state on the basis of mercenary arms, he will never be firm or secure; because they are disunited, ambitious, without discipline, unfaithful; gallant among friends, vile among enemies; no fear of God, no faith with men; and one defers ruin insofar as one defers the attack; and in peace you are despoiled by them, in war by the enemy.